easyJet’s share price has taken off! Is now the time to buy the stock? Image source: Getty Images. Enter Your Email Address Click here to claim your copy now — and we’ll tell you the name of this Top US Share… free of charge! Our 6 ‘Best Buys Now’ Shares “This Stock Could Be Like Buying Amazon in 1997” Over the last few weeks, easyJet (LSE: EZJ) shares have enjoyed quite a spectacular surge. Back in mid-May, you could pick up the shares for less than 500p. Last week however, easyJet’s share price rose as high as 772p at one point.The reason is easyJet recently announced that, after grounding its entire fleet back in March due to Covid-19, it will restart a “small number of flights” on 15 June. That’s obviously a positive development.5G is here – and shares of this ‘sleeping giant’ could be a great way for you to potentially profit!According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US$12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…And if you click here we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential…Are the shares worth buying now? Here’s my view. easyJet: uncertainty remains elevatedWhen I last covered easyJet shares in late March, I said there was an “enormous amount of uncertainty in relation to the investment case.” My view was the stock wasn’t worth the risk.Clearly, the outlook now looks a little better for easyJet. In a few weeks’ time, the airline will begin flying again in the UK and France. And the company plans to announce further routes over the coming weeks as lockdown measures across Europe are relaxed and customer demand increases.Make no mistake though, there’s still a lot of uncertainty here. Potentially, it could be years before global travel returns to pre-Covid-19 levels. Recently, easyJet boss Johan Lundgren said he believes passenger numbers won’t return to 2019 levels until 2023.And, in the near term, I think it’s likely Covid-19 will continue to throw spanners in the works for airlines. As an example, just last week, a man onboard a plane in Spain discovered he had Covid-19 mid-air, which forced the aircraft and passengers into immediate quarantine on arrival. And don’t forget about UK quarantine rules. From 8 June, people arriving from overseas arrivals into the UK will have to self-isolate for 14 days. How will this affect travel?An equity raise could hit the share priceMeanwhile, there’s questions over easyJet’s balance sheet. Recently, a top City airline analyst said easyJet may have to raise up to £1bn through a rights issue in the next few months. If EZJ does raise this kind of capital, it’ll most likely hit the share price.All of these issues add a lot of uncertainty, which isn’t what you want as an investor.Warren Buffett’s view on airline stocksUltimately, I think Warren Buffett has it spot on when he said recently that “the world has changed for the airlines.” He recently sold all of his airline stocks, saying the industry has been “really hurt” by events that are far beyond our control. Buffett is one of the greatest investors of all time, so his stance on airlines stocks is probably worth noting.easyJet shares: I think investors can do betterAll things considered, I continue to believe easyJet shares aren’t worth the risk right now. Yes, the share price could continue rising if the Covid-19 situation improves. But it could just as easily crash if the coronavirus situation deteriorates and the travel industry is disrupted for longer. I think buying an airline stock now is too much of a gamble. In my opinion, you’re much better off focusing on companies poised for strong growth in the years ahead, no matter what happens with Covid-19. There are plenty of these types of companies if you know where to look. Simply click below to discover how you can take advantage of this. Edward Sheldon has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Renowned stock-picker Mark Rogers and his analyst team at The Motley Fool UK have named 6 shares that they believe UK investors should consider buying NOW.So if you’re looking for more stock ideas to try and best position your portfolio today, then it might be a good day for you. Because we’re offering a full 33% off your first year of membership to our flagship share-tipping service, backed by our ‘no quibbles’ 30-day subscription fee refund guarantee. Edward Sheldon, CFA | Monday, 1st June, 2020 | More on: EZJ See all posts by Edward Sheldon, CFA I’m sure you’ll agree that’s quite the statement from Motley Fool Co-Founder Tom Gardner.But since our US analyst team first recommended shares in this unique tech stock back in 2016, the value has soared.What’s more, we firmly believe there’s still plenty of upside in its future. In fact, even throughout the current coronavirus crisis, its performance has been beating Wall St expectations.And right now, we’re giving you a chance to discover exactly what has got our analysts all fired up about this niche industry phenomenon, in our FREE special report, A Top US Share From The Motley Fool. I would like to receive emails from you about product information and offers from The Fool and its business partners. Each of these emails will provide a link to unsubscribe from future emails. More information about how The Fool collects, stores, and handles personal data is available in its Privacy Statement.
Senate meeting discusses new changes with Campus Dining leadership, tackles internal tensions over social justice, considers replacing Executive Programming Board
The Notre Dame student senate convened Thursday evening to hear from Campus Dining leadership about sustainability initiatives, menu enhancements and service format in Campus Dining operations this semester. Senior Rachel Ingal, student body president, also addressed internal tensions that came to a head with a Letter to the Editor, which criticized Student Government’s response to social justice issues.Senators also voted to pass an order regarding allocation of funds from the COVID-19 Response Financial Account and tabled an order to replace the Executive Programming Board with an Executive Committee.The meeting began with a presentation by Chris Abayasinghe, senior director of Campus Dining, Cheryl Bauer, director of Sourcing and Sustainability and Luigi Alberganti, director of student dining. Abayasinghe said Campus Dining has had to make many changes to adapt to public health regulations as well as students’ concerns.“This truly has been probably the most flexible and most pivoting of times,” he said. Some adjustments they have had to make focus on the disposable nature of containers, plastic bags and cutlery — all essential, nonetheless, to the take out format necessitated by the pandemic.Bauer announced a switch from compostable take out containers to mineral-filled polypropylene, which retain heat better, are sturdier and are manufactured in Minnesota.Campus Dining will also stop offering plastic bags Sept. 22 and single-use cutlery later on. They will sell BeeGreen reusable bags at Huddle Mart and the dining halls, and will give each student two stainless steel cutlery kits beginning Sept. 28. Student Government held a reusable cutlery giveaway Sept. 9 during which they distributed around 500 kits to students, junior Jackson Oxler, a member of the Department of Student Life and the Department of Sustainability, told The Observer.“It’s much easier to cut stainless versus the plastic and in these new containers, you are going to be able to cut inside of them … So it seems like a win-win all the way around,” Bauer said.Since COVID-19 regulations do not allow for drink refills, the single-use cups will still be used, according to Abayasinghe. “Over time, what we’re seeking is an actual replacement for the vessel itself,” he said.Other changes to dining operations include hiring more staff to serve students over 29,000 meals a day, according to Alberganti. Staff is also now serving food directly into the containers as students file past in line. Abayasinghe noted that new desserts have been introduced to the menu, such as red velvet cake, apple pie and Boston cream pie.After Campus Dining leadership’s presentation, senior Sarah Galbenski, student body vice president and chair of the student senate, opened with an executive announcement. She updated her peers on the first meeting of the University Committee on Women Faculty and Students (UCWFS) Thursday, which dealt with the new Title IX policies. The next meeting, she said, will take place Oct. 21 and focus on campus climate ahead of the November general election.After Galbenski’s announcement, Ingal referred to the aforementioned Letter to the Editor published in The Observer Thursday. Dillon Hall student leaders submitted the letter ahead of the meeting, asking for a more forceful, actionable response from Student Government in addressing private prison labor.After a student-led virtual strike for racial justice Aug. 31, the Student Senate passed order SS 2021-16, asking the University administration to continue engaging in dialogue with student organizations committed to racial justice and anti-racism. Senior Dillon Hall senator and one of the letter’s authors, Mike Dugan criticized the resolution.(Editor’s Note: Dugan is a former Observer news writer and Systems Administrator.)“Rather than taking a firm stance on specific issues of racial injustice that pertain to our campus community, however, the Senate simply voted to encourage administrators to continue to talk with students,” Dugan and other Dillon student leaders said in the letter. “We believe that the Senate could have and should have taken a stronger stance.”Specifically, the Dillon residents criticized Galbenski’s decision, as chair of the student senate, to not include a Senate Order in the agenda for the senate meeting.Dugan and senior Ricardo Pozas Garza, Club Coordination Council president, had drafted said order “to ensure that Student Union Organizations, and groups that receive funding from the Student Union, divest from companies that use prison labor and/or forced labor in order to obtain profit.”The letter’s authors also found fault with the rejection of their order, as they compared its contents with the other items in Thursday’s agenda.“None of these priorities carry the moral weight or urgency associated with ensuring that money collected from students in a mandatory fee is not spent in a socially irresponsible manner nor invested into companies that directly profit from human rights abuses,” they wrote.In her executive announcement at the senate meeting, Ingal vouched for Galbenski. She listed reasons why she had asked her to be student body vice president and the ways in which she said Galbenski has shown a commitment to racial justice and the student senate.The senate had received five resolutions this week, three of which carried over from the previous week. The two new resolutions could therefore not be included in Thursday’s agenda, Ingal said, and Galbenski reached out to the authors to explain why.While there is not a deadline requirement included in the senate bylaws, Galbenski has prepared a document with frequently asked questions for senators, in which she writes that, in order to be considered as “new business” in the week’s agenda, a piece of legislation must be submitted by Sunday. But Dugan and Pozas Garza’s order was not submitted until Monday, Galbenski told The Observer.“By no means did she deny debate time to a bill she didn’t support or refuse to hear this piece of legislation,” Ingal added.Chief of staff Aaron Benavides also spoke, characterizing the letter as “unbecoming of any member of the Student Union.” He cautioned against personal attacks, which he said might “distract us from the essential work that we must undertake.”(Editor’s Note: Benavides is a former Observer news writer.)Ten senators wrote a Letter to the Editor published Friday in response to the Dillon students’ letter, expressing their support for Galbenski and explaining the situation from their perspective.After the executive announcements, Benavides read an order presented by senior Grace Stephenson, Student Union treasurer and chairwoman of the Financial Management Board (FMB). Order SO 2021-07 would make $10,000 available from the Student Union COVID-19 Response Financial Account for allocation to Student Union organizations and special interest groups who apply. The order passed.The second order in the agenda was read over Zoom by senior Tiffany Pages-Sanchez, Judicial Council vice president of peer advocacy, on behalf of junior Matthew Bisner, Judicial Council president. Bisner authored the document but was not present for most of the meeting. The order, which passed, effectively made Audrey Feldman and Thomas Krapfl the First-Year Class Council Representatives for their respective dorms, Cavanaugh and Dunne Hall, since only one candidate had been received by the Judicial Council for both residence halls.Benavides then read SO 2021-09. The order proposed an amendment to the Constitution of the Undergraduate Student Body replacing the Executive Programming Board (EPB) with the Executive Committee. Per the order, the committee would “serve as a forum for the executive officers of the Student Union branches to communicate and collaborate on policy, programming, and other issues relevant to the Student Body and Student Union.”“Over the past several years, EPB has really lacked a focus or a purpose or any signs of duty,” Benavides said. “Nothing was really ever accomplished. We see that this group accomplishes more of what EPB was supposed to do, but it never really got off the ground.”During debate time, junior Thomas Davis II, Student Union parliamentarian, asked that the senate send the order to the Committee on the Constitution first, so they could approve the amendment. The order was ultimately tabled and referred to said committee.Tags: Campus DIning, Letter to the Editor, private prisons, student senate
At 4:20 p.m. today, millions of people around the world are expected to congregate in public places and defy laws prohibiting the use of cannabis-based products.The number of marijuana-related arrests on campus has decreased 20 percent since last year, while the number of marijuana-related referrals has increased, according to USC Dept. of Public Safety Capt. David Carlisle.Students in possession of one ounce or less of marijuana are referred to the Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards, while those in possession of more than one ounce of marijuana are arrested.According to Adam Leventhal, a USC associate professor of preventative medicine and psychology, college students might choose to use marijuana because of a genetic predisposition, the euphoric and calming effects the drug can deliver, or because of the way marijuana is represented in modern society.Leventhal also said colleges often foster an atmosphere conducive to trying new activities and, subsequently trying new drugs.“Marijuana is an example of a new experience that people can try for the first time when they are in college, like certain sports or sexual activities,” Leventhal said. “Some students are sensation seekers and thrive on those new, exciting experiences.”Marijuana has been decriminalized in California since 2010, meaning possession of one ounce or less of marijuana is only punishable by a $100 fine. Possession of more than an ounce of marijuana is a misdemeanor under state law, and results in a $500 fine and up to six months in jail.Some USC students, including Justin Hunter, a freshman majoring in computer engineering and computer science, believe marijuana should be legalized.“It is much less harmful than any legal drug such as drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco,” Hunter said. “It is [also] less harmful for the people around the user.”DPS is not planning to alter its operations or policies today, according to Carlisle.A study released earlier this month by the Partnership at Drugfree.org in conjunction with the MetLife Foundation reports the number of young adults who admitted to using marijuana increased from 32 percent in 2008 to 39 percent in 2010.The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, indicates the percent of teenagers using marijuana has not changed from 2007 to 2009. These statistics are more accurate, according to Adam Leventhal, a USC associate professor of preventative medicine and psychology.